A Few User Experiences in Banking
Last December, I visited a financial planner. It was well worth the time and hassle of tracking down recommendations from folks whom I trust. It was enlightening but also daunting -- I had a lot of work ahead of me to get prepared for retirement at 30. (Tsk, and some call me an idealist).
Anyway, among the many great recommendations was to explore investment opportunities available in any of a number of companies. So, I started doing some research and now have intimately experienced the user flow and options available to me behind three major financial institutions, which I refuse to name because I don't want anyone to steal from me.
Here are some observations I've found in my micro-research:
Decision paralysis on the home page is alive and well. One of the companies had no visual or content hierarchy -- it was literally line item after line item of everything I could use them for. This is OK if I'm just scanning for a certain keyword, but it's also anxiety-inducing. Another company had much better visual hierarchy -- for example, there was a question on the home page that asked "New to Investing?" -- but then led me to a landing page with enough choices for a seasoned investor. The conversion funnel could be more effective if I felt a guided experience rather than a free-for-all.
Two of three companies structured their user experiences around their own internal organization. This is amazingly annoying when I want to move money from point A to point B and have to sign into two different interfaces and have confirmations from both. Why on Earth would you require your users to jump through these hoops just because your internal territories are so deep? However, one company did invest obvious love and care into audience research and ease of use, which then made the other two seem even more bureaucratic.
Pop-up explanations are everywhere, but never seem to help. Maybe this is just me, but I don't really need a glossary when trying to manage my banking online. Instead, I need answers to questions that seem nowhere to be found (like, when setting up bill pay for an individual, does the date I choose dictate when the check is cut or when it's delivered?). Or the answers are off on some page beyond my current view, which makes keeping things in context very difficult. But, to remedy this, see the next point:
Live chat works. I feel weird typing this, but it's true. On each of the three companies I was researching, I used the live chat option and found stellar results -- one of which was so pleasurable thanks to friendly customer support that they earned my business. (A follow-up call afterwards gave me the warm fuzzies, too.)
Overall, I was amazed that two of three financial institutions I surveyed are capable of managing millions (billions?) of dollars for people but aren't better equipped to manage their users' experiences intuitively. Maybe I'm expecting too much?
A UX Reading List
Way back in December my colleague Mindy set out her web design goals for 2009 , and included "Continue to improve my understanding of User Experience design" at #4 on her list. We've got a well-stocked UX bookshelf a Viget South, and Mindy's post got me thinking about the books I recommend to people who want to learn more about user experience design, information architecture, usability, and interaction design. I set my own goal of putting together a "UX canon" that I would be able to share. Well, it's nearly March and I've yet to finish my reading list. Thankfully, the design faculty at the School of Visual Arts did me a favor and posted there own interaction design reading recommendations. It's a pretty good list, and has most of the books I had in mind to include in my own reading list. I highly recommend that you check it out, and in the spirit of sharing, I do want to recommend five books that didn't make it onto the SVA list:
Let Your “Regulars” Do Your Work
Ok, so I had a great (and effective) marketing tactic used on me this morning. I’m a relatively new coffee/espresso drinker, but I noticed pretty quickly that the barista at this new, non-[major franchise] shop had forgotten the hazelnut syrup I had requested. But, because I still need my sugar fix, I turned around at the end of the parking lot and went back in with the intention of just grabbing a few sugar packets rather than making a fuss. The barista recognized me though, and I felt compelled to mention the oversight. He apologized emphatically and added the syrup; which is really the best I would have hoped for.
The manager, however, overheard the exchange and stepped in to offer me a free sandwich for the error; which, to me, seemed excessive, but an extremely gracious gesture that was good for his up-and-coming business. I protested slightly, but then he hooked me by saying, “Really, it’s fine – you’re a regular.” Now, I’ve only been in this shop four times (granted, three of them were this week), so I’m hardly a “regular.” But, by calling me one, I now felt pressured to actually BE one. On top of that, I was quick to mention the experience to the first person I ran into this morning. I’m spreading the word.
Here at Viget, we strive every day to not just get people to our clients’ sites, but to make them “regulars” on those sites. We propose marketing and social strategies, blogs, content revisions, and design updates to grab people, draw them in, and, hopefully, keep them coming back for more. But, in a fickle, ever-changing online world, how can we ensure that we’re connecting with our core audience? We’ve written before about ways in which customer service and brand personality effect online experiences, but allow me to add another case study to the list.
The Lefsetz Letter focuses largely on the music industry; but, in a post this week, Bob Lefsetz recounts an experience he had with one of my personal favorite e-commerce sites for outdoor gear.
I immediately received an e-mail confirmation that said "Get stoked - most items ship within 24 hours." That’s how they talk on the hill. But most e-commerce sites use the traditional phrases, vetted by attorneys to avoid any and all lawsuits. These companies are not run by humans, but computers. Just try to complain when you’ve got a problem. And then, three hours later, came another e-mail. With the above quote. Yes, "Holy crap. Your stuff just shipped." Wasn’t I supposed to wait ten days for them to make money on my money? They ship within twenty four hours? But what truly sold me was the irreverence. Real people work at Tramdock.com. Or at least real people wrote the computer scripts.
And those are the keys. Mr. Lefsetz was not only able to make that connection between the company that was trying to make money from him and the people who are actually behind that company, but they exceeded his expectations as well. So with a necessary focus on keywords and SEO to get people to our sites, how do we bridge the gap between marketing and personality in order to keep them there?
Bob closed with this:
Play to your core. If you deserve to be bigger, your fans will spread the word. And don’t be afraid of offending those not in the loop. They don’t matter.
In the end, he “gets” what I “get” about this site. Backcountry gear isn’t for everyone, so why try to speak to everyone? Find a voice that speaks to your core audience, exceed their expectations, and your “regulars” will do the work for you.
Easy enough, right?

